Physics vs. TK

This article was written by Shyler on 2008-01-23 under Telekinesis.

This article was written in response to a certain Andrew J. who said, "Our minds can't movie objects. telekinesis is fake and not real. The law of physics states in order to move an object there needs to be a force. Telekinesis is not force." In response to him, energy creates a force, given off from the body in the form of heat and so it grows stronger and stronger with mental suggesstion. If sound cannot be seen, but it gives off waves, and it cannot be heard unless there is a recieving end, then is it still considered a force? Yes.

So what difference is TK? Read the article and find out for yourself. In physics we say that work is done on an object when you transfer energy to that object. Work formula- W = F � d Energy is defined as the ability to do work. Work is defined as the transfer of energy. Telekinetics put their kinetic energy to use by concentrating it through the specified object at will. If something has potential energy then it has the ability to do work. Kinetic energy enables this action. Energy being played out is force and force upon an object causing displacement is work. Therefore, so long as energy is carried out in some form of force then you are doing work. This is true with Telekinesis. In telekinesis, through will and visualization, one attempts to change potential energy into kinetic energy by directing it at an object. The energy is forced to build as it comes into contact with the object, thus causing movement. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be manipulated. Physics does not specify how. Also, how can you disprove something that has never been proved? Telekinesis is a theory that some claim to be able to do. Many on this site claim to be able to do it. But remember, dear physicists that evolution is also a theory, but it is still taught and believed. Give TK�s their time to prove their abilities and we will give you yours. Physics teaches much about kinetic energy, but how can it attempt to explain this vast universe? It is simply the blind leading the blind here people. In physics, mass�energy equivalence is the concept that any mass has an associated energy and vice versa.

E=mc 2 Sound is a force, it travels as waves, and can be heard from all drirections by your ears, because they are rigged to decode the information. However telekenetic waves may not yet have a way of being interpreted. Because we can not observe something, it would be alot harder to work out what that thing is. Do not try to disprove a theory until you have first tried to prove it. Shyler 1/23/08 Someone by the name of �Yahweh� had some good insight into this entire ordeal, he wrote:

Yahweh Borrowed from site: http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-10139.html It is actually quite a paradox: How can your disprove the existence of something which does not already exist? To get beyond this, Science derives itself from a few basic axioms (i.e. the external world exists is an example). If I told you I could morph into a tiger at the snap of my fingers, what would it take to disprove that I really dont have this ability? Follow-up: If my tiger-morphing claim cant be disproved, is it still possible? Note: Dont let common sense fly out the window, keep your Philosophy seperate from Science whenever you can.

Register or Login to comment!

42 Comments:

MyTK Shoutbox:

Hello Newbie. If you want to enjoy the full MyTK experience, sign up!