A question to all of you who are experienced in kinesis
When you make articles about different types of kinesis, atmo and chronokinesis for example, is all of the information contained in the article things that you have actually done and train in a lot? Some of articles sound theorectical, particularly the ones that are poorly written/have bad grammer. I just can't take some of them seriously.
I myself am inexperienced on this website and in telekinesis in general. I've only been doing telekinesis for about a month.
9 Comments
Top Comments
Koori_shinobi
Orion
Theoretical?Dont judge a book by its cover nor contents,because it may hold value.^_____^
Everything Else...
Diazin
I dont get the point of posting "techs" here when what everything here is about is making of your intention reality. Want to create any technique? Fine: STEP ONE: GATHER ENERGY (QUALITY AND AMOUNT) STEP TWO: SHAPE IT STEP THREE: PROGRAM IT CONGRATZ, YOU'RE NOW A MASTER!1! :O
NajeeTheNinja
I've also seen many articles where it seems as though the creator thought hard about how it COULD work and then got excited and wrote an article.
NajeeTheNinja
@Orion - Some things can be judged, like 10-year-olds claiming that you can fly with the wind.... @fgopl - I would never learn through a tech, anyway. Seeing all of the advanced techniques made to sound so easy in one article would discourage you while doing the painstaking training.
fgopl
It's like music. A tech is like a piece of music. Let's say there's a beautiful piece you want to play. Well, before playing it, you have to learn to play the instrument, and do the basic exercises.
fgopl
Some aggrandizers post tings they never did. Best thing is to never trust a tech. Techs should be used once you know the basics of a skill. All the information on a skill CANNOT POSSIBLY be placed in one article, because everything is intricate and well-developed in the world of psionics, this is why we don't use techs to learn.
Orion
Theoretical?Dont judge a book by its cover nor contents,because it may hold value.^_____^
NajeeTheNinja
@Koori - Spelling and grammar are two different things. And it's easy to misspell grammar occaisionally. @Caius - I won't know unless I ask. I can't have faith in people who put out theoretical junk.
Caius
How many times have we seen articles like this? You just wasted your time..
By Koori_shinobi
Lol. "bad grammer"
a year ago