A question to all of you who are experienced in kinesis
When you make articles about different types of kinesis, atmo and chronokinesis for example, is all of the information contained in the article things that you have actually done and train in a lot? Some of articles sound theorectical, particularly the ones that are poorly written/have bad grammer. I just can't take some of them seriously.
I myself am inexperienced on this website and in telekinesis in general. I've only been doing telekinesis for about a month.